About this book

American nights entertainment

Grant M. Overton

that other trait of Yankee shrewdness, the caution which restrains and then goes in headlong, was brought into play. Mr. Lincoln committed himself wholeheartedly to his fictional enterprise. He put all his money, or rather, the energy which was his equivalent for money, on the bob-tailed nag--in a little sloop which was his own boat rather than in somebody else’s two-masted schooner. The rest was plain sailing and persistence that could have been fatally spoiled if that inner dryness of wit and clearness of perception had ever failed him. But he never forgot that it was his own little sloop, the sailing of which must be kept within the manœuvres she could execute. He has never, for example, tried to write the great American novel which, consciously or unconsciously, has brought up into the wind, all sails shaking and way lost, the craft of more than one of his fellow sailors. A Yankee and shrewd, earning many rewards, including that of a very widespread affection. Books by Joseph C. Lincoln 1902 _Cape Cod Ballads_ 1904 _Cap’n Eri_ 1905 _Partners of the Tide_ 1906 _Mr. Pratt_ 1907 _The “Old Home House”_ 1908 _Cy Whittaker’s Place_ 1909 _Our Village_ 1909 _Keziah Coffin_ 1910 _The Depot Master_ 1911 _Cap’n Warren’s Wards_ 1911 _The Woman-Haters_ 1912 _The Postmaster_ 1912 _The Rise of Roscoe Paine_ 1913 _Mr. Pratt’s Patients_ 1914 _Cap’n Dan’s Daughter_ 1914 _Kent Knowles: Quahaug_ 1915 _Thankful’s Inheritance_ 1916 _Mary-’Gusta_ 1917 _Extricating Obadiah_ 1918 “_Shavings_” 1919 _The Portygee_ 1921 _Galusha the Magnificent_ 1922 _Fair Harbor_ 1923 _Doctor Nye of North Ostable_ All fiction, except _Cape Cod Ballads_ (verse) and _Our Village_ (sketches of life and people on the Cape). Sources on Joseph C. Lincoln _Joseph Crosby Lincoln._ Booklet published by D. APPLETON & COMPANY, 1921. _Joseph C. Lincoln’s America_, by Hildegarde Hawthorne. Booklet. D. APPLETON & COMPANY, 1921. _Some Samples of Yankee Shrewdness_, by Joseph C. Lincoln. Article in AMERICAN MAGAZINE, July, 1919. _My Types: An Interview with Joseph C. Lincoln_, by Charles Francis Reed, THE FORUM MAGAZINE, February, 1919. _Cape Cod’s Genial Chronicler_: An Appreciation by Hamlin Garland. PUBLISHER’S WEEKLY, 17 April, 1920. _The Men Who Make Our Novels_, by George Gordon. MOFFAT, YARD & COMPANY, 1919. _Joseph Crosby Lincoln_, by Adam C. Haeselbarth. BOOK NEWS MONTHLY, 1913. _20. Edith Wharton and the Time Spirit_ i At just past sixty Edith Wharton’s is still a name for the literary conjuror in search of an impressive effect. She has lived a long time--in the literary sense--and comparisons are not easy; she has outlived, as a writer, most comparisons, including the one which would probably have been fatal to anyone else, the comparison with Henry James. She has outlived, in the physical sense, Henry James himself; there are no more of his frequent letters to “Dear Edith.” It is among the subtler tributes to Mrs. Wharton, the person, that the intellectual relation between her and the man who was once called her “Master” is now seen in a light which considerably enhances the dignity of the woman who was once called “Pupil.” For who, after reading the correspondence of Henry James, published since his death, believes any longer that Mrs. Wharton ever owed anything to that man’s patronage so nicely tinctured with snobbery? Victor Hugo permitted himself to be surrounded by those who worshipped him as a god, but Hugo posed, godlike; whereas Henry James---- Mrs. Atherton is several years older than Edith Wharton, both as person and author; Mary Johnston, born eight years later, is of almost exactly the same literary age; but the first is a superb journalist and a born storyteller and the second is a mystic and a historian. Mrs. Wharton’s journalism in fiction is pretty well confined to _The House of Mirth_ and _The Fruit of the Tree_; she invites comparison with Mary Johnston only in that ambitious novel of mediæval Italy, _The Valley of Decision_. In the two books on which Mrs. Wharton’s fame definitely rests at the present, _Ethan Frome_ and _The Age of Innocence_, she achieves a success and an individuality only the more interesting because it finds so strikingly different expressions. In fact, on the evidence of the two stories, it would be superficially impossible to assert that the “sterile” tragedy of New England hillsides was from the same hand that wrote the minutely detailed story of New York society in the 1870s. Considered for their meaning and origin, _Ethan Frome_ and _The Age of Innocence_ are both seen to be tales of frustration, both tales of the America that Mrs. Wharton quitted some fifteen years ago but can’t get out of her system, and both stories in which the background is responsible for the actors themselves as well as the play. ii
Illustration note[Illustration: EDITH WHARTON]
Edith Newbold Jones was born in New York, 24 January, 1862, the daughter of Frederic Jones who had married Lucretia Stevens Rhinelander. One grandparent was a Stevens, another a Schermerhorn. A great deal of her childhood was spent in Europe--there was one stretch of five years in which the family didn’t return to America--and education proceeded wholly with the aid of tutors and governesses. The child learned French, German and Italian. Such summers as the family devoted to America were lived in a house at Newport, on the bay, halfway out towards Fort Adams. When Miss Jones was twenty-three she became the wife of Edward Wharton, of Boston. They lived in New York and Newport and later at Lenox in the summer, frequent visits to Europe continuing. Miss Jones and Mrs. Wharton were equally interested in writing and read extensively Goethe, Balzac, Thackeray, Dickens, Flaubert, George Eliot, Meredith and--Henry James? That last one had begun as author while Miss Jones was still in her teens. Twenty years were to pass before she started to overtake him. Mrs. Wharton was thirty-seven in the year when her first book was published, _The Greater Inclination_, containing, according to Katharine Fullerton Gerould, “two of the best stories she ever wrote” (“The Pelican” and “Souls Belated”). Six years later came _The House of Mirth_, “the tragedy of the woman who is a little too weak to do without money and what it buys, or to earn it for herself, and a little too good to sell herself.” The story of Lily Bart had to a high degree that provocative quality which can generally be relied upon to make a novel a best-seller; and a best-seller it became. Soon afterward, with a feeling in which satisfaction, distaste, caution and physical preferences were obscurely blended, Mrs. Wharton settled in France--winter home in Provence, summer home near Paris. In 1914 she opened a workroom for skilled woman workers thrown out of employment by the miscalculations of Napoleon III. a generation earlier. She also opened restaurants where French and Belgian refugees were fed at less than cost, and lodgings where they might sleep. Mrs. Wharton took full charge of over 600 Belgian children who had been withdrawn from orphanages near Furnes and Poperinghe and established them, with the nuns who had the children’s care, in four colonies, where the girls were taught fine sewing and lace-making, in anticipation of a day when fine sewing and lace-making would again be demanded. For these services the French Government, in 1915, conferred on the American novelist the cross of the Legion of Honour. During the war Mrs. Wharton wrote little. _Fighting France_ records her visits to the French fronts; she contributed to _The Book of the Homeless_; in 1918 was published her long short story of an American boy in the war, under the title, _The Marne_; in 1920, _In Morocco_ gave an account of a visit to that country which she made with General Lyautey, by invitation of the French Government. _French Ways and Their Meaning_ appeared in 1919. The total roll of Mrs. Wharton’s non-fiction is considerable and includes _Italian Villas and Their Gardens_ (1904), _Italian Backgrounds_ (1905), _A Motor-Flight Through France_ (1908), _Artemis to Actæon and Other Verse_ (1909), _The Decoration of Houses_, as well as the books just mentioned. No article on Mrs. Wharton would be complete unless mention was made of her passion for gardening and her art in developing beautiful gardens, both at her home in Hyères and at St. Brice, near Paris. iii We have had it all carefully explained for us by Mrs. Gerould how much more desirable it is that Mrs. Wharton should give us--as she has generally given us--studies of sophisticated people. Speaking of _Ethan Frome_, and, in fact, merely mentioning that masterpiece, for which, it would appear, she is without admiration, Mrs. Gerould says of Mrs. Wharton: “She did not abandon her civilised and sophisticated folk, for any length of time, to deal with rustics. Let us hope that she never will abandon them. There is vital truth in the Shakesperean dictum that ‘the hand of little employment hath the daintier sense.’ To put it roughly”--as a rustic, no doubt, might put it--“the people who have leisure to experience their own emotions, and the education to show them how the emotions fit into the traditions of the race, are more interesting in themselves than the people whose emotions are bound to be on a more nearly animal plane. It is less interesting, morally, to the average man to know how the sub-average man conducts himself than to know how the super-average man conducts himself. It does not in the least matter to the average intelligent citizen--except as it may touch his social conscience--how the characters in certain modern novels behave, because those characters are not the real fruit of civilisation. They are, at best, its sorry by-products. They do not help him out in his own problems; they do not stand to him for vicarious experience. Whereas it is of interest to a civilised man to know how other civilised beings, in situations his own or other, behave; even if they behave badly. Theirs are dramas that he can feel, theirs is conduct that he is competent to judge; they respond, or fail to respond, to an admitted code of moral taste. No creature was beyond the range of Shakespeare’s sympathetic understanding; but when he wished to probe the human heart most deeply, he usually chose the heart of a king. The insensitive and the subnormal served him chiefly for comedy. “So that a positive purpose is served by the competent novelist’s choosing to deal with the more fortunate classes. Inhibitions have more chance; and inhibitions are as necessary to real drama as are passions. There is also--naturally--more opportunity for satire; and satiric comment is inveterate in Mrs. Wharton’s work. If the person who has had every chance is not fine, then he is relatively uglier than the person who has had no chance at all. She does not spare her aristocrats who had an opportunity for moral fineness and neglected it. The baser emotions are more shocking in a world where there is less excuse for them. And since it is real life with which Mrs. Wharton is dealing, the baser emotions frequently appear.” These words were written after, not before, the publication of Mrs. Wharton’s novel, _The Glimpses of the Moon_ (1922). At sixty, one either prepares to die or one faces life anew. In the latter event one knows, if one chances to be a writer, the heavenly and earthly certitudes ... and the escape from platitudes is final. Thus, for example, it is given to understand that a reputation will at least last for the remainder of a lifetime but that markets change. And, after all, as Mrs. Wharton once remarked, cleanliness and comfort