My Bondage and My Freedom
markets, where the victims are to be sold like horses, sheep, and
swine, knocked off to the highest bidder. There I see the tenderest
ties ruthlessly broken, to gratify the lust, caprice, and rapacity of
the buyers and sellers of men. My soul sickens at the sight.
Is this the land your fathers loved?
The freedom which they toiled to win?
Is this the earth whereon they moved?
Are these the graves they slumber in?
But a still more inhuman, disgraceful, and scandalous state of things
remains to be presented. By an act of the American congress, not yet
two years old, slavery has been nationalized in its most horrible and
revolting form. By that act, Mason and Dixon’s line has been
obliterated; New York has become as Virginia; and the power to hold,
hunt, and sell men, women, and children as slaves, remains no longer a
mere state institution, but is now an institution of the whole United
States. The power is coextensive with the star-spangled banner and
American christianity. Where these go, may also go the merciless
slave-hunter. Where these are, man is not sacred. He is a bird for the
sportsman’s gun. By that most foul and fiendish of all human decrees,
the liberty and person of every man are put in peril. Your broad
republican domain is a hunting-ground for _men_. Not for thieves and
robbers, enemies of society, merely, but for men guilty of no crime.
Your law-makers have commanded all good citizens to engage in this
hellish sport. Your president, your secretary of state, your lords,
nobles, and ecclesiastics, enforce as a duty you owe to your free and
glorious country and to your God, that you do this accursed thing. Not
fewer than forty Americans have within the past two years been hunted
down, and without a moment’s warning, hurried away in chains, and
consigned to slavery and excruciating torture. Some of these have had
wives and children dependent on them for bread; but of this no account
was made. The right of the hunter to his prey, stands superior to the
right of marriage, and to _all_ rights in this republic, the rights of
God included! For black men there are neither law, justice, humanity,
nor religion. The fugitive slave law makes MERCY TO THEM A CRIME; and
bribes the judge who tries them. An American judge GETS TEN DOLLARS FOR
EVERY VICTIM HE CONSIGNS to slavery, and five, when he fails to do so.
The oath of an(sic) two villains is sufficient, under this hell-black
enactment, to send the most pious and exemplary black man into the
remorseless jaws of slavery! His own testimony is nothing. He can bring
no witnesses for himself. The minister of American justice is bound by
the law to hear but _one side_, and that side is the side of the
oppressor. Let this damning fact be perpetually told. Let it be
thundered around the world, that, in tyrant-killing, king hating,
people-loving, democratic, Christian America, the seats of justice are
filled with judges, who hold their office under an open and palpable
_bribe_, and are bound, in deciding in the case of a man’s liberty, _to
hear only his accusers!_
In glaring violation of justice, in shameless disregard of the forms of
administering law, in cunning arrangement to entrap the defenseless,
and in diabolical intent, this fugitive slave law stands alone in the
annals of tyrannical legislation. I doubt if there be another nation on
the globe having the brass and the baseness to put such a law on the
statute-book. If any man in this assembly thinks differently from me in
this matter, and feels able to disprove my statements, I will gladly
confront him at any suitable time and place he may select.
THE SLAVERY PARTY. Extract from a Speech Delivered before the A. A. S.
Society, in New York, May, 1853.
Sir, it is evident that there is in this country a purely slavery
party—a party which exists for no other earthly purpose but to promote
the interests of slavery. The presence of this party is felt everywhere
in the republic. It is known by no particular name, and has assumed no
definite shape; but its branches reach far and wide in the church and
in the state. This shapeless and nameless party is not intangible in
other and more important respects. That party, sir, has determined upon
a fixed, definite, and comprehensive policy toward the whole colored
population of the United States. What that policy is, it becomes us as
abolitionists, and especially does it become the colored people
themselves, to consider and to understand fully. We ought to know who
our enemies are, where they are, and what are their objects and
measures. Well, sir, here is my version of it—not original with me—but
mine because I hold it to be true.
I understand this policy to comprehend five cardinal objects. They are
these: 1st. The complete suppression of all anti-slavery discussion.
2d. The expatriation of the entire free people of color from the United
States. 3d. The unending perpetuation of slavery in this republic. 4th.
The nationalization of slavery to the extent of making slavery
respected in every state of the Union. 5th. The extension of slavery
over Mexico and the entire South American states.
Sir, these objects are forcibly presented to us in the stern logic of
passing events; in the facts which are and have been passing around us
during the last three years. The country has been and is now dividing
on these grand issues. In their magnitude, these issues cast all others
into the shade, depriving them of all life and vitality. Old party ties
are broken. Like is finding its like on either side of these great
issues, and the great battle is at hand. For the present, the best
representative of the slavery party in politics is the democratic
party. Its great head for the present is President Pierce, whose boast
it was, before his election, that his whole life had been consistent
with the interests of slavery, that he is above reproach on that score.
In his inaugural address, he reassures the south on this point. Well,
the head of the slave power being in power, it is natural that the pro
slavery elements should cluster around the administration, and this is
rapidly being done. A fraternization is going on. The stringent
protectionists and the free-traders strike hands. The supporters of
Fillmore are becoming the supporters of Pierce. The silver-gray whig
shakes hands with the hunker democrat; the former only differing from
the latter in name. They are of one heart, one mind, and the union is
natural and perhaps inevitable. Both hate Negroes; both hate progress;
both hate the “higher law;” both hate William H. Seward; both hate the
free democratic party; and upon this hateful basis they are forming a
union of hatred. “Pilate and Herod are thus made friends.” Even the
central organ of the whig party is extending its beggar hand for a
morsel from the table of slavery democracy, and when spurned from the
feast by the more deserving, it pockets the insult; when kicked on one
side it turns the other, and preseveres in its importunities. The fact
is, that paper comprehends the demands of the times; it understands the
age and its issues; it wisely sees that slavery and freedom are the
great antagonistic forces in the country, and it goes to its own side.
Silver grays and hunkers all understand this. They are, therefore,
rapidly sinking all other questions to nothing, compared with the
increasing demands of slavery. They are collecting, arranging, and
consolidating their forces for the accomplishment of their appointed
work.
The keystone to the arch of this grand union of the slavery party of
the United States, is the compromise of 1850. In that compromise we
have all the objects of our slaveholding policy specified. It is, sir,
favorable to this view of the designs of the slave power, that both the
whig and the democratic party bent lower, sunk deeper, and strained
harder, in their conventions, preparatory to the late presidential
election, to meet the demands of the slavery party than at any previous
time in their history. Never did parties come before the northern
people with propositions of such undisguised contempt for the moral
sentiment and the religious ideas of that people. They virtually asked
them to unite in a war upon free speech, and upon conscience, and to
drive the Almighty presence from the councils of the nation. Resting
their platforms upon the fugitive slave bill, they boldly asked the
people for political power to execute the horrible and hell-black
provisions of that bill. The history of that election reveals, with
great clearness, the extent to which slavery has shot its leprous
distillment through the life-blood of the nation. The party most
thoroughly opposed to the cause of justice and humanity, triumphed;
while the party suspected of a leaning toward liberty, was
overwhelmingly defeated, some say annihilated.
But here is a still more important fact, illustrating the designs of
the slave power. It is a fact full of meaning, that no sooner did the
democratic slavery party come into power, than a system of legislation
was presented to the legislatures of the northern states, designed to
put the states in harmony with the fugitive slave law, and the
malignant bearing of the national government toward the colored
inhabitants of the country. This whole movement on the part of the
states, bears the evidence of having one origin, emanating from one
head, and urged forward by one power. It was simultaneous, uniform, and
general, and looked to one end. It was intended to put thorns under
feet already bleeding; to crush a people already bowed down; to enslave
a people already but half free; in a word, it was intended to
discourage, dishearten, and drive the free colored people out of the
country. In looking at the recent black law of Illinois, one is struck
dumb with its enormity. It would seem that the men who enacted that
law, had not only banished from their minds all sense of justice, but
all sense of shame. It coolly proposes to sell the bodies and souls of
the blacks to increase the intelligence and refinement of the whites;
to rob every black stranger who ventures among them, to increase their
literary fund.
While this is going on in the states, a pro-slavery, political board of
health is established at Washington. Senators Hale, Chase, and Sumner
are robbed of a part of their senatorial dignity and consequence as
representing sovereign states, because they have refused to be
inoculated with the slavery virus. Among the services which a senator
is expected by his state to perform, are many that can only be done
efficiently on committees; and, in saying to these honorable senators,
you shall not serve on the committees of this body, the slavery party
took the responsibility of robbing and insulting the states that sent
them. It is an attempt at Washington to decide for the states who shall
be sent to the senate. Sir, it strikes me that this aggression on the
part of the slave power did not meet at the hands of the proscribed
senators the rebuke which we had a right to expect would be
administered. It seems to me that an opportunity was lost, that the
great principle of senatorial equality was left undefended, at a time
when its vindication was sternly demanded. But it is not to the purpose
of my present statement to criticise the conduct of our friends. I am
persuaded that much ought to be left to the discretion of anti slavery
men in congress, and charges of recreancy should never be made but on
the most sufficient grounds. For, of all the places in the world where
an anti-slavery man needs the confidence and encouragement of friends,
I take Washington to be that place.
Let me now call attention to the social influences which are operating
and cooperating with the slavery party of the country, designed to