Stonewall Jackson and the American Civil War
their qualifications for such a life were undeniable. A more gallant or
high-spirited body of young soldiers never welcomed the boot and
saddle. Their horses were their own, scions of good Virginian stock,
with the blood of many a well-known sire—Eclipse, Brighteyes, and
Timoleon—in their veins, and they knew how to care for them. They were
acquainted with every country lane and woodland track. They had friends
in every village, and their names were known to every farmer. The night
was no hindrance to them, even in the region of the mountain and the
forest. The hunter’s paths were as familiar to them as the turnpike
roads. They knew the depth and direction of every ford, and could
predict the effect of the weather on stream and track. More admirable
material for the service of intelligence could not possibly have been
found, and Ashby’s audacity in reconnaissance found ready imitators. A
generous rivalry in deeds of daring spread through the command. Bold
enterprises were succeeded by others yet more bold, and, to use the
words of a gentleman who, although he was a veteran of four years’
service, was but nineteen years of age when Richmond fell, “We thought
no more of riding through the enemy’s bivouacs than of riding round our
fathers’ farms.” So congenial were the duties of the cavalry, so
attractive the life and the associations, that it was no rare thing for
a Virginia gentleman to resign a commission in another arm in order to
join his friends and kinsmen as a private in Ashby’s ranks. And so
before the war had been in progress for many months the fame of the
Virginia cavalry rivalled that of their Revolutionary forbears under
Light-Horse Harry, the friend of Washington and the father of Lee.
But if the raw material of Jackson’s army was all that could be
desired, no less so was the material of the force opposed to him. The
regiments of Banks’ army corps were recruited as a rule in the Western
States; Ohio,
Indiana, and West Virginia furnished the majority. They too were
hunters and farmers, accustomed to firearms, and skilled in woodcraft.
No hardier infantry marched beneath the Stars and Stripes; the
artillery, armed with a proportion of rifled guns, was more efficient
than that of the Confederates; and in cavalry alone were the Federals
overmatched. In numbers the latter were far superior to Ashby’s
squadrons; in everything else they were immeasurably inferior.
Throughout the North horsemanship was practically an unknown art. The
gentlemen of New England had not inherited the love of their Ironside
ancestors for the saddle and the chase. Even in the forests of the West
men travelled by waggon and hunted on foot. “As cavalry,” says one of
Banks’ brigadiers, “Ashby’s men were greatly superior to ours. In reply
to some orders I had given, my cavalry commander replied, ‘I can’t
catch them, sir; they leap fences and walls like deer; neither our men
nor our horses are so trained.’”[7]
It was easy enough to fill the ranks of the Northern squadrons. Men
volunteered freely for what they deemed the more dashing branch of the
service, ignorant that its duties were far harder both to learn and to
execute than those of the other arms, and expecting, says a Federal
officer, that the regiment would be accompanied by an itinerant livery
stable! Both horses and men were recruited without the slightest
reference to their fitness for cavalry work. No man was rejected, no
matter what his size or weight, no matter whether he had ever had
anything to do with horseflesh or not, and consequently the proportion
of sick horses was enormous. Moreover, while the Southern troopers
generally carried a firearm, either rifle or shot-gun, some of the
Northern squadrons had only the sabre, and in a wooded country the
firearm was master of the situation. During the first two years of the
war, therefore, the Federal cavalry, generally speaking, were bad
riders and worse horse-masters, unable to move except upon the roads,
and as inefficient on reconnaissance as in action. For an invading
army, information, ample and accurate, is the first requisite.
Operating in a country which, almost invariably, must be better known
to the defenders, bold scouting alone will secure it from ambush and
surprise. Bold scouting was impossible with such mounted troops as
Banks possessed, and throughout the Valley campaign the Northern
general was simply groping in the dark.
But even had his cavalry been more efficient, it is doubtful whether
Banks would have profited. His appointment was political. He was an
ardent Abolitionist, but he knew nothing whatever of soldiering. He had
begun life as a hand in a cotton factory. By dint of energy and good
brains his rise had been rapid; and although, when the war broke out,
he was still a young man, he had been Governor of Massachusetts and
Speaker of the House of Representatives. What the President expected
when he gave him an army corps it is difficult to divine; what might
have been expected any soldier could have told him. To gratify an
individual, or perhaps to conciliate a political faction, the life of
many a private soldier was sacrificed. Lincoln, it is true, was by no
means solitary in the unwisdom of his selections for command. His rival
in Richmond, it is said, had a fatal penchant for his first wife’s
relations; his political supporters were constantly rewarded by
appointments in the field, and the worst disasters that befell the
Confederacy were due, in great part, to the blunders of officers
promoted for any other reason than efficiency. For Mr. Davis there was
little excuse. He had been educated at West Point. He had served in the
regular army of the United States, and had been Secretary of War at
Washington. Lincoln, on the other hand, knew nothing of war, beyond
what he had learned in a border skirmish, and very little of general
history. He had not yet got rid of the common Anglo-Saxon idea that a
man who has pluck and muscle is already a good soldier, and that the
same qualities which serve in a street-brawl are all that is necessary
to make a general. Nor were historical precedents wanting for the
mistakes of the American statesmen. In both the Peninsula and the
Crimea, lives, treasure, and prestige were as recklessly wasted as in
Virginia; and
staff officers who owed their positions to social influence alone,
generals, useless and ignorant, who succeeded to responsible command by
virtue of seniority and a long purse, were the standing curse of the
English army. At the same time, it may well be questioned whether some
of the regular officers would have done better than Banks. He was no
fool, and if he had not studied the art of war, there have been
barrack-square generals who have showed as much ignorance without
one-quarter his ability. Natural commonsense has often a better chance
of success than a rusty brain, and a mind narrowed by routine. After
serving in twenty campaigns Frederick the Great’s mules were still
mules. On this very theatre of war, in the forests beyond Romney, an
English general had led a detachment of English soldiers to a defeat as
crushing as it was disgraceful, and Braddock was a veteran of many
wars. Here, too, Patterson, an officer of Volunteers who had seen much
service, had allowed Johnston to slip away and join Beauregard on Bull
Run. The Northern people, in good truth, had as yet no reason to place
implicit confidence in the leading of trained soldiers. They had yet to
learn that mere length of service is no test whatever of capacity for
command, and that character fortified by knowledge is the only charm
which attracts success.
Jackson had already some acquaintance with Banks. During the Romney
expedition the latter had been posted at Frederick with 16,000 men, and
a more enterprising commander would at least have endeavoured to thwart
the Confederate movements. Banks, supine in his camps, made neither
threat nor demonstration. Throughout the winter, Ashby’s troopers had
ridden unmolested along the bank of the Potomac. Lander alone had
worried the Confederate outposts, driven in their advanced detachments,
and drawn supplies from the Virginian farms. Banks had been
over-cautious and inactive, and Jackson had not failed to note his
characteristics.
March 9 Up to March 9 the Federal general, keeping his cavalry in rear,
had pushed forward no farther than Charlestown and Bunker Hill. On that
day the news reached McClellan that the Confederates were preparing
to abandon Centreville. He at once determined to push forward his whole
army.
March 12 Banks was instructed to move on Winchester, and on the morning
of the 12th his leading division occupied the town.
Jackson had withdrawn the previous evening. Twice, on March 7 and again
on the 11th, he had offered battle.[8] His men had remained under arms
all day in the hope that the enemy’s advanced guard might be tempted to
attack. But the activity of Ashby’s cavalry, and the boldness with
which Jackson maintained his position, impressed his adversary with the
conviction that the Confederate force was much greater than it really
was. It was reported in the Federal camps that the enemy’s strength was
from 7,000 to 11,000 men, and that the town was fortified. Jackson’s
force did not amount to half that number, and, according to a Northern
officer, “one could have jumped over his intrenchments as easily as
Remus over the walls of Rome.”
Jackson abandoned Winchester with extreme reluctance. Besides being the
principal town in that section of the Valley, it was strategically
important to the enemy. Good roads led in every direction, and
communication was easy with Romney and Cumberland to the north-west,
and with Washington and Manassas to the south-east. Placed at
Winchester, Banks could support, or be supported by, the troops in West
Virginia or the army south of Washington. A large and fertile district
would thus be severed from the Confederacy, and the line of invasion
across the Upper Potomac completely blocked. Overwhelming as was the
strength of the Union force, exceeding his own by more than eight to
one, great as was the caution of the Federal leader, it was only an
unlucky accident that restrained Jackson from a resolute endeavour to
at least postpone the capture of the town. He had failed to induce the
enemy’s advanced guard to attack him in position. To attack himself, in
broad daylight, with such vast disproportion of numbers, was out of the
question. His resources, however, were not exhausted. After dark on the
12th, when his troops had left the town, he called a council,
consisting of General Garnett and the regimental commanders of the
Stonewall Brigade, and proposed a night attack on the Federal advance.
When the troops had eaten their supper and rested for some hours, they
were to march to the neighbourhood of the enemy, some four miles north
of Winchester, and make the attack before daylight. The Federal troops
were raw and inexperienced. Prestige was on the side of the
Confederates, and their morale was high. The darkness, the suddenness
and energy of the attack, the lack of drill and discipline, would all
tend to throw the enemy into confusion; and “by the vigorous use of the
bayonet, and the blessing of divine Providence,” Jackson believed that
he would win a signal victory. In the meantime, whilst the council was
assembling, he went off, booted and spurred, to make a hasty call on
Dr. Graham, whose family he found oppressed with the gloom that
overspread the whole town. “He was so buoyant and hopeful himself that
their drooping spirits were revived, and after engaging with them in
family worship, he retired, departing with a cheerful ‘Good evening,’
merely saying that he intended to dine with them the next day as
usual.”