About this book

The Bābur-nāma in English (Memoirs of Bābur)

Emperor of Hindustan Babur

[2145] _aūstī_; perhaps the reservoir was so built as to contain the bubbling spring. [2146] _Chūn jā'ī khẉush karda ām._ [2147] f. 315. [2148] var. Janwār (Jarrett). It is 25 m. east of Āgra on the Muttra-Etāwa road (_G. of I._). [2149] _kūcha-band_, perhaps a barricade at the limit of a suburban lane. [2150] This has been mentioned already (f. 327). [2151] f. 315. [2152] _i.e._ those professedly held for Bābur. [2153] Or, according to local pronunciation, Badāyūn. [2154] This is the old name of Shāhābād in Rāmpūr (_G. of I._ xxii, 197). The _A.-i-A._ locates it in Saṃbal. Cf. E. and D.'s _History of India_, iv, 384 n. and v. 215 n. [2155] Perhaps the one in Sītapūr. [2156] f. 305_b_. [2157] As the Elphinstone Codex which is the treasure-house of Humāyūn's notes, has a long _lacuna_ into which this episode falls, it is not known if the culprit entered in his copy of the _Bābur-nāma_ a marginal excuse for his misconduct (cf. f. 252 and n.); such excuse was likely to be that he knew he would be forgiven by his clement father. [2158] f. 305_b_. [2159] Kāmrān would be in Qandahār. Erskine notes that the sum sent to him would be about £750, but that if the coins were rūpīs, it would be £30,000. [2160] _qiṯa`_, for account of which form of poem _see_ Blochmann's translations of Saifī's and Jāmī's _Prosody_, p. 86. [2161] _Rāmpūr Dīwān_ (E. D. Ross' ed. p. 16 and Plate 14_a_). I am uncertain as to the meaning of ll. 4 and 10. I am not sure that what in most MSS. ends line 4, _viz._ _aūl dam_, should not be read as _aūlūm_, death; this is allowed by Plate 14a where for space the word is divided and may be _aūlūm_. To read _aūlūm_ and that the deserters fled from the death in Hind they were anxious about, has an answering phrase in "we still are alive". Ll. 9 and 10 perhaps mean that in the things named all have done alike. [Ilminsky reads _khāir nafsī_ for the elsewhere _ḥaz̤z̤-nafsī_.] [2162] These are 20 attitudes (_rak`ah_) assumed in prayer during Ramẓān after the Bed-time Prayer. The ablution (_ghusl_) is the bathing of the whole body for ceremonial purification. [2163] This Feast is the `Id-i-fiṯṛ, held at the breaking of the Ramẓān Fast on the 1st of Shawwāl. [2164] Erskine notes that this is the earliest mention of playing-cards he can recall in oriental literature. [2165] f. 339_b_. [2166] The two varieties mentioned by Bābur seem to be _Diospyrus melanoxylon_, the wood of which is called _tindu abnūs_ in Hindūstānī, and _D. tomentosa_, Hindi, _tindu_ (Brandis _s.nn._). Bārī is 19 m. west of Dūlpūr. [2167] _mī`ād_, perhaps the time at which the Shaikh was to appear before Bābur. [2168] The Pers. trs. makes the more definite statement that what had to be read was a Section of the Qoran (_wird_). This was done with remedial aim for the illness. [2169] As this statement needs comment, and as it is linked to matters mentioned in the _Rāmpūr Dīwān_, it seems better to remit remarks upon it to Appendix Q, _Some matters concerning the Rāmpūr Dīwān_. [2170] _risāla._ _See_ Appendix Q. [2171] Elph. MS. _lacuna_; I.O. 215 _lacuna_ and 217 f. 229; Mems. p. 373. This year's narrative resumes the diary form. [2172] There is some uncertainty about these names and also as to which adversary crossed the river. The sentence which, I think, shews, by its plural verb, that Humāyūn left two men and, by its co-ordinate participles, that it was they crossed the river, is as follows:—(Darwīsh and Yūsuf, understood) _Quṯb Sīrwānī-nī u bīr pāra rājalār-nī bīr daryā aūtūb aūrūshūb yakshī bāsīb tūrlār_. _Aūtūb_, _aūrūshūb_ and _bāsīb_ are grammatically referable to the same subject, [whatever was the fact about the crossing]. [2173] _bīr daryā_; W.-i-B. 217 f. 229, _yak daryā_, one river, but many MSS. _har daryā_, every river. If it did not seem pretty certain that the rebels were not in the Miyān-dū-āb one would surmise the river to be "one river" of the two enclosing the tract "between the waters", and that one to be the Ganges. It may be one near Saṃbhal, east of the Ganges. [2174] var. Shīrwānī. The place giving the cognomen may be Sarwān, a _thakurāt_ of the Mālwā Agency (_G. of I._). Quṯb of Sīrwān may be the Quṯb Khān of earlier mention without the cognomen. [2175] n.w. of Aligarh (Kūl). It may be noted here, where instances begin to be frequent, that my translation "we marched" is an evasion of the Turkī impersonal "it was marched". Most rarely does Bābur write "we marched", never, "I marched." [2176] in the Aligarh (Kūl) district; it is the Sikandara Rao of the _A.-i-A._ and the _G. of I._ [2177] _Rāmpūr Dīwān_ (E. D. Ross' ed., p. 19, Plate 16_b_). This _Dīwān_ contains other quatrains which, judging from their contents, may well be those Bābur speaks of as also composed in Saṃbal. _See_ Appendix Q, _Some matters concerning the Rāmpūr Dīwān_. [2178] These are aunts of Bābur, daughters of Sl. Abū-sa`īd _Mīrān-shāhī_. [2179] Sikandarābād is in the Buland-shahr district of the United Provinces. [2180] It is not clear whether Bābur returned from Sīkrī on the day he started for Jalīsīr; no question of distance would prevent him from making the two journeys on the Monday. [2181] As this was the rendezvous for the army, it would be convenient if it lay between Āgra and Anwār; as it was 6 m. from Āgra, the only mapped place having approximately the name Jalīsīr, _viz._ Jalesar, in Etah, seems too far away. [2182] Anwār would be suitably the Unwāra of the _Indian Atlas_, which is on the first important southward dip of the Jumna below Āgra. Chandwār is 25 m. east of Āgra, on the Muttra-Etāwah road (_G. of I._); Jarrett notes that Tiefenthaler identifies it with Fīrūzābād (_A.-i-A._ ii, 183 n.). [2183] In the district of Kālpī. The name does not appear in maps I have seen. [2184] _āghā_, Anglicé, uncle. He was Sa`īd Khān of Kāshghar. Ḥaidar M. says Bābā Sl. was a spoiled child and died without mending his ways. [2185] From Kālpī Bābur will have taken the road to the s.w. near which now runs the Cawnpur (Kānhpūr) branch of the Indian Midland Railway, and he must have crossed the Betwa to reach Īrij (Irich, _Indian Atlas_, Sheet 69 N.W.). [2186] Leaving Īrij, Bābur will have recrossed the Betwa and have left its valley to go west to Bāndīr (Bhander) on the Pahūj (_Indian Atlas_, Sheet 69 S.W.). [2187] beneficent, or Muḥassan, comely. [2188] The one man of this name mentioned in the _B.N._ is an amīr of Sl. Ḥusain _Bāī-qarā_. [2189] It seems safe to take Kachwa [Kajwa] as the Kajwarra of Ibn Batūta, and the Kadwāha (Kadwaia) of the _Indian Atlas_, Sheet 52 N.E. and of Luard's _Gazetteer_ _of Gwalior_ (i, 247), which is situated in 24° 58' N. and 77° 57' E. Each of the three names is of a place standing on a lake; Ibn Batūta's lake was a league (4 m.) long, Bābur's about 11 miles round; Luard mentions no lake, but the _Indian Atlas_ marks one quite close to Kadwāha of such form as to seem to have a tongue of land jutting into it from the north-west, and thus suiting Bābur's description of the site of Kachwa. Again,—Ibn Batūta writes of Kajwarra as having, round its lake, idol-temples; Luard says of Kadwāha that it has four idol-temples standing and nine in ruins; there may be hinted something special about Bābur's Kachwa by his remark that he encouraged its people, and this speciality may be interaction between Muḥammadanism and Hindūism serving here for the purpose of identification. For Ibn Batūta writes of the people of Kajwarra that they were _jogīs_, yellowed by asceticism, wearing their hair long and matted, and having Muḥammadan followers who desired to learn their (occult?) secrets. If the same interaction existed in Bābur's day, the Muḥammadan following of the Hindū ascetics may well have been the special circumstance which led him to promise protection to those Hindūs, even when he was out for Holy-war. It has to be remembered of Chandīrī, the nearest powerful neighbour of Kadwāha, that though Bābur's capture makes a vivid picture of Hindūism in it, it had been under Muḥammadan rulers down to a relatively short time before his conquest. The _jogīs_ of Kachwa could point to long-standing relations of tolerance by the Chandīrī Governors; this, with their Muḥammadan following, explains the encouragement Bābur gave them, and helps to identify Kachwa with Kajarra. It may be observed that Bābur was familiar with the interaction of the two creeds, witness his "apostates", mostly Muḥammadans following Hindū customs, witness too, for the persistent fact, the reports of District-officers under the British _Rāj_. Again,—a further circumstance helping to identify Kajwarra, Kachwa and Kadwāha is that these are names of the last important station the traveller and the soldier, as well perhaps as the modern wayfarer, stays in before reaching Chandīrī. The importance of Kajwarra is shewn by Ibn Batūta, and of Kadwāha by its being a _maḥāll_ in Akbar's _sarkār_ of Bāyawān of the _ṣūba_ of Āgra. Again,—Kadwāha is the place nearest to Chandīrī about which Bābur's difficulties as to intermediate road and jungle would arise. That intermediate road takes off the main one a little south of Kadwāha and runs through what looks like a narrow valley and broken country down to Bhamor, Bhurānpūr and Chandīrī. Again,—no bar to identification of the three names is placed by their differences of form, in consideration of the vicissitudes they have weathered in tongue, script, and transliteration. There is some ground, I believe, for surmising that their common source is _kajūr_, the date-fruit. [I am indebted to my husband for the help derived from Ibn Batūta, traced by him in Sanguinetti's trs. iv, 33, and S. Lee's trs. p. 162.] (Two places similar in name to Kachwa, and situated on Bābur's route _viz._ Kocha near Jhansi, and Kuchoowa north of Kadwāha (Sheet 69 S.W.) are unsuitable for his "Kachwa", the first because too near Bandīr to suit his itinerary, the second because too far from the turn off the main-road mentioned above, because it has no lake, and has not the help in identification detailed above of Kadwāha.) [2190] _qūrūghīr_ which could mean also _reserved_ (from the water?). [2191] _qāzān._ There seems to have been one only; how few Bābur had is shewn again on f. 337. [2192] _Indian Atlas_, Sheet 52 N.E. near a tributary of the Betwa, the Or, which appears to be Bābur's Burhānpūr-water. [2193] The bed of the Betwa opposite Chandīrī is 1050 ft. above the sea; the walled-town (_qūrghān_) of Chandīrī is on a table-land 250 ft. higher, and its citadel is 230 ft. higher again (Cunningham's _Archeological Survey Report_, 1871 A.D. ii, 404). [2194] The plan of Chandīrī illustrating Cunningham's Report (_see_ last note) allows surmise about the road taken by Bābur, surmise which could become knowledge if the names of tanks he gives were still known. The courtesy of the Government of India allows me to reproduce that plan [Appendix R, _Chandīrī_ and _Gwālīāwar]_. [2195] He is said to have been Governor of Chandīrī in 1513 AD. [2196] Here and in similar passages the word _m:ljār_ or