About this book

The Bruce

John Barbour

leg armour (p. 230). 456 _Thai dispendit haly that day, In spoulyheing._ The author of _Vita Edw._ declares that it was the preoccupation of the Scots with the plunder that allowed many English to escape. In his precise way, he estimates that the valuable equipment which fell to the Scots was worth £200,000 (p. 206), or at the ratio of 1:15 about £3,000,000 present day (_cf._ note on 667-8). 463 _spuris rede._ _I.e._, gilt or gold spurs worn only by knights. The 700 pairs of C would give us 700 knights slain; E’s 200 is probably nearer the truth. In _Ann. Lond._, (p. 231) we get a list of thirty-seven knights slain at “the battle of Stirling.” Of the foot and squires, it is said, the most part (_maxima pars_) was not slain. Baker says about 300 men-at-arms (_viri militares_) were among the slain (57). Bower gives 200 knights slain besides Gloucester (_Scotich._ Goodall, edition 1759, ii., p. 250). Walsingham, from his MS. source, fixes the number of knights and squires who fell at 700 (_Historia Anglicana_, p. 141); Capgrave the lords, barons, and knights slain and captured at 154. More than 500 were reported dead who were afterwards found to be captives (_Chronicle_, p. 180) and had to be ransomed (_Vita Edw._, p. 206). Fabyan gives forty-two noblemen slain, and sixty-seven knights and baronets, while twelve “men of name” were taken prisoner (_New Chronicles_, p. 420). 466 _Gilbert of Clar._ About twenty-three years of age (_Ann. Lond._, p. 231). He fell in the first charge (_Vita Edw._; _Baker_). Baker says the Scots would have gladly taken him alive for ransom had they known who he was, but that he did not wear his surcoat (_toga_) with his coat of arms (p. 57). _Cf._ lines 510-11. _That men callit_, says Barbour, having in mind Ralph de Monthermer, his step-father who had previously borne the title. 468 _Payne Typtot._ Paganus Typetot (_Vita Edw._) or Tybetot (_Ann. Lond._). “Paganus Typetoft,” or “Typetot,” is the name in _Chron. de Lanercost_. 472 _Wilyhame Vepownt._ Sir William de Vepont (Veteriponte) was a Scotsman in the service of England till 1312, having been imprisoned on capture during the Comyn resistance in 1302. He was under Valence in Ayr in 1307 (_Bain_, ii., Nos. 1,283, 1,294; iii., No. 263). _Walter the Ros_ was serving England in Linlithgow in 1312 (_Bain_, iii., p. 411). 486 _at rebours._ _I.e._, treated badly, held “in great dislike” (Skeat). See Glossary. Edward had a son, Alexander, by Isabella of Atholl (_Exchq. Rolls_, II. cxxxii.). 489-90 _Erll Davy of Adell._ Lord Hailes did not know “what judgment to form of this story,” in view of the fact that sentence of forfeiture was not passed against Atholl till 1323 (_Annales_, ii. 58 note). But his lands were forfeited by October, 1314, and granted to Sir Neil Campbell (Robertson’s _Index_, p. 26; ii. _Scots Peerage_), and he, then being in England, received three manors from Edward II. “till he recovers his Scottish possessions” (_Bain_, iii., p. 75). Atholl’s career is, however, puzzling. His wife was Johanna, daughter of the murdered Comyn of Badenoch. Up till 1312 he is a supporter of England, and in December of that year even seems to have sat in the English Parliament. But in the previous October he is among those present in Bruce’s Parliament at Inverness (_Acta. Parl. Scot._, vol. i., 103); next appears as Constable of Scotland, and, early in 1313, is a witness to charters to the Abbey of Arbroath (_Scots Peerage_). Then comes a blank till October, 1314, as above. There is thus room for Barbour’s story: Atholl did give a short-lived support to the national cause, and a forfeiture of his lands did follow soon after Bannockburn. He remained an active adherent of England till his death, January, 1327. 495 _Wilyhame of Herth._ Apparently William Mareschal of Erth (_Bain_, iii. 343; _cf._ note on 61). Sir William de Erth was a supporter of Comyn in the Barons’ War, and capitulated with him and others at Strathorde on February 9, 1304 (_Bain_, ii., No. 1,741). William de Erth, knight, was alive in 1333 (_Bain_, iii. 1,099). Erth, or Airth, is on the east of Stirlingshire, on the Forth. 510 _somdeill anoyit._ _Cf._ note on 466. 512 _till a kirk he gert hym be Brocht._ John de Trokelowe says that Bruce sent the bodies of Gloucester and Clifford to King Edward while at Berwick, to be buried as he wished, and this without demanding any payment as ransom (_Annales_, p. 87). 533 _Betung_ in C is certainly wrong; E gives the correct form _Twenge_. Marmaduke de Twenge appears on the list in _Foedera_ and elsewhere. He was the hero of Stirling Bridge (1297), who cut his way back over the bridge. 531 _trete hym curtasly._ Trokelowe says that Bruce caused his noble prisoners to be treated so becomingly and courteously (_decenter ac civiliter_) “that the hearts of many who were opposed to him he turned, in a wonderful way, to feeling an affection for him” (_Annales_, p. 87). 544 _become of his dwelling._ “Became one of his company,” as in _Bk._ IV. 481, where Bruce says of Douglas and his men in Arran: “Thai ar all of my duelling.” 553 _Lowrens_ = Lawrence. Probably the same Sir Lawrence de Abernethy who in 1338 had provisions sent him by Edward III. for the Castle of Hawthornden. He was thus “Inglis man” again (_Bain_, iii., p. 235, No. 1,291). 578-85 _He convoyit thame so narrowly, etc._ “Some, however, lagging in the flight, were slain by the Scots, who followed them swiftly (_velociter_)” (_Chron. de Lanercost_, p. 227). “The King escaped with great trouble” (_a graunt payn_, _Scala._, p. 143). 587 _Wynchburch._ On the road from Linlithgow to Edinburgh. 592 _so feill._ According to the _Lanercost_ historian, the King was accompanied by many knights and footmen (p. 227). 612 _Erll Patrik._ Of March. See note on _Bk._ XI. 46. “Patrick Earl of March received him honourably, etc., for at that time he was his man” (_soun homager_. _Scala._, 143.). 615-16 _A bate_, etc. “When he came thither (Dunbar) he embarked on a ship, and with his own company put in at Berwick” (_Vita Edw. Sec._, p. 205). “Thence the King went by sea to Berwick and afterwards to the south” (_Scala._, 143). “At Dunbar the King, with his special friends, embarked on a boat (_scapham_) for Berwick” (_Lanercost_, p. 227). Barbour says they landed at Bamborough on the coast of Yorkshire, and in line 645 gives the number who thus accompanied the King as seventeen. 619-21 _The laiff_, etc. “The others (see above), not having a ship, come (to Berwick) by land” (_Vita Edw. Sec._, p. 205). The King, says the _Lanercost_ writer, left all the others to their fate, who, however, came safe and sound to England (p. 228). 631 _The Kyng eschapit._ According to Baker, “no mortal ingenuity, neither the swiftness of the horses nor the cover on the way (_involucra locorum_) could have kept the King from capture by the Scots,” had not Christ Himself, at the intercession of His Mother, brought him out of Scottish territory, as both the King and his companions afterwards confessed. In his peril Edward vowed to found a monastery dedicated to the “Mother of God,” where twenty-four friars might study theology (_Baker_, p. 58); and, in fulfilment thereof, established Oriel College at Oxford (_Hailes_, ii. 57 note). 667-8 _The castell and the towrys ... doune gert he myne._ Stirling Castle thus lay in ruins till 1336-7, when it was rebuilt for Edward III. “after the conquest,” probably on the old plan. Stone walls and towers were erected, a “peel” of wood, to the north the walls (_parietes_) of which were plastered over, and various inner buildings for the garrison, etc., also of wood daubed with mortar and roofed with turf (_Bain_, iii., pp. 364-8). The rebuilding and repairs cost £280, equal to about £4,000 now (_Bain_, lviii.). 676 _he gaf._ See note on 409. 687 _The Erll wes changit._ In _Vita Edw. Sec._ (pp. 208-9) is recorded the exchange of the Earl for the wife of Bruce and other Scottish captives, including the Bishop of Glasgow. On October 2, 1314, “Robert, Bishop of Glasgow, the Countess Carrick, wife of Robert de Brus, with his sister and daughter and Donald de Mar,” were at Carlisle Castle, “to be taken thence to a place arranged by the Earl of Essex and Hereford and the Sheriff” (_Bain_, iii., No. 393). Mar is, no doubt, the “young earl” referred to in the _Vita Edw._, which says further that Edward gave to his sister, Hereford’s wife, all the Scottish captives since the time of Edward I.--fifteen and more--to procure the release of her husband (p. 208). 695 _wes King._ Robert II. 697 _Davy._ David II. (June 7, 1329 to February 22, 1371). He scarcely deserved Barbour’s epithet “worthy.” 702 _Fif yheir._ In 1375 Robert was in the fifth year of his reign; he would not have “passit” it till February 22, 1376. He was born March 2, 1316, and in 1375 was in his sixtieth year. The year in Scotland, however, began on March 25, so that Barbour’s cross-dating really stands for what we should call the early spring of 1376. He was then engaged on _The Bruce_. 705-6 _the gud King Robert._ _I.e._, Robert I. the Bruce, dead forty-six years. It is curious to find this elaborate dating “of the compyling of this book” here, and not at the end. Evidently the mention of the marriage of the Steward, the reigning King’s father, is Barbour’s cue. There is no reason to suppose that this was a subsequent insertion, and we may conclude that the poem was completed somewhat later. 736 _our-raid all Northumbirland._ “They (the Scots) plundered the northern bounds of England as far as Richmond and returned, devastating the country with fire and carrying off with them many captives” (_Gesta Edwardi_, p. 47). _Cf._ Barbour, lines following. On July 1, 1314, the Bishop of Durham writes the King regarding Scottish preparations for an invasion of England, of which he has heard. On October 7, 1314, the Prior and Convent of Durham pay the Earl of Murray eight hundred marks to secure the bishopric immunity from invasion for a stated period (_Letters from Northern Registers_, Nos. cxliv., cxlix.). According to the _Lanercost_ chronicler, the Scots entered by Berwick, and burned almost all Northumberland, spared Durham for a monetary consideration, penetrated to the Tees and to Richmond, and returned, via Lanercost, with a great body of cattle and captives (pp. 228, 229). BOOK XIV. 4 _Scotland to litill wes._ According to the Annalist, it was the Scots who were not satisfied with their own country; but this is merely a rhetorical comment (_Annals of Ireland_, p. 344). The anonymous Chronicle in Stevenson’s _Illustrations_ says that Edward Bruce, elated by the success of the Scots, aspired to the name of King (_ad nomen regium aspirans_, p. 3). Fordun’s version is the same as that of Barbour: “Edward Bruce was not willing to live in peace with his brother unless he got half the kingdom for himself, and for this reason the war was started in Ireland” (_Gesta Annalia_, cxxxiii.). 8 _had treting With the Erischry._ It was afterwards (1316-17) made a charge against Walter de Lacy and Hugh de Lacy, Earl of Ulster, that they had sent messengers and letters to invite Edward Bruce to Ireland. The legal documents in the case are given in _Chartularies, etc., of St. Mary’s Abbey_ (vol. ii., pp. 407-9). This charge is also noted in the _Annals of Ireland_ (Fragment), under February 2, 1317, where it is said that, on inquiry, the Lacys were acquitted (p. 298). Nevertheless, they and their relatives were fined £200 (_Preface_, p. cxxix). The _Chronicle_ in Stevenson appears to refer to the same case, when it says that Edward Bruce was persistently (_sæpissime_) invited by a certain Irish magnate with whom he had been educated in his youth (p. 3).