The secret of Father Brown
"They say it's bad luck to break a looking-glass," he said. "This looks
like the very house of ill-luck. There's something about the very
furniture----"
"That's rather odd," said Bagshaw sharply. "I thought the front door
would be shut, but it's left on the latch."
There was no reply; and they passed out of the front door into the front
garden, a narrower and more formal plot of flowers, having at one end a
curiously clipped hedge with a hole in it, like a green cave, under the
shadow of which some broken steps peeped out.
Father Brown strolled up to the hole and ducked his head under it. A few
moments after he had disappeared they were astonished to hear his quiet
voice in conversation above their heads, as if he were talking to
somebody at the top of a tree. The detective followed, and found that
the curious covered stairway led to what looked like a broken bridge,
over-hanging the darker and emptier spaces of the garden. It just curled
round the corner of the house, bringing in sight the field of coloured
lights beyond and beneath. Probably it was the relic of some abandoned
architectural fancy of building a sort of terrace on arches across the
lawn. Bagshaw thought it a curious cul-de-sac in which to find anybody
in the small hours between night and morning; but he was not looking at
the details of it just then. He was looking at the man who was found.
As the man stood with his back turned, a small man in light grey
clothes, the one outstanding feature about him was a wonderful head of
hair, as yellow and radiant as the head of a huge dandelion. It was
literally outstanding like a halo, and something in that association
made the face, when it was slowly and sulkily turned on them, rather a
shock of contrast. That halo should have enclosed an oval face of the
mildly angelic sort; but the face was crabbed and elderly with a
powerful jowl and a short nose that somehow suggested the broken nose of
a pugilist.
"This is Mr. Orm, the celebrated poet, I understand," said Father Brown,
as calmly as if he were introducing two people in a drawing-room.
"Whoever he is," said Bagshaw, "I must trouble him to come with me and
answer a few questions."
Mr. Osric Orm, the poet, was not a model of self-expression when it came
to the answering of questions. There, in that corner of the old garden,
as the grey twilight before dawn began to creep over the heavy hedges
and the broken bridge, and afterwards in a succession of circumstances
and stages of legal inquiry that grew more and more ominous, he refused
to say anything except that he had intended to call on Sir Humphrey
Gwynne, but had not done so because he could not get anyone to answer
the bell. When it was pointed out that the door was practically open, he
snorted. When it was hinted that the hour was somewhat late, he snarled.
The little that he said was obscure, either because he really knew
hardly any English, or because he knew better than to know any. His
opinions seemed to be of a nihilistic and destructive sort, as was
indeed the tendency of his poetry for those who could follow it; and it
seemed possible that his business with the judge, and perhaps his
quarrel with the judge, had been something in the anarchist line. Gwynne
was known to have had something of a mania about Bolshevist spies, as he
had about German spies. Anyhow, one coincidence, only a few moments
after his capture, confirmed Bagshaw in the impression that the case
must be taken seriously. As they went out of the front gate into the
street, they so happened to encounter yet another neighbour, Buller, the
cigar merchant from next door, conspicuous by his brown, shrewd face and
the unique orchid in his buttonhole; for he had a name in that branch of
horticulture. Rather to the surprise of the rest, he hailed his
neighbour, the poet, in a matter-of-fact manner, almost as if he had
expected to see him.
"Hallo, here we are again," he said. "Had a long talk with old Gwynne, I
suppose?"
"Sir Humphrey Gwynne is dead," said Bagshaw. "I am investigating the
case and I must ask you to explain."
Buller stood as still as the lamp-post beside him, possibly stiffened
with surprise. The red end of his cigar brightened and darkened
rhythmically, but his brown face was in shadow; when he spoke it was
with quite a new voice.
"I only mean," he said, "that when I passed two hours ago Mr. Orm was
going in at this gate to see Sir Humphrey."
"He says he hasn't seen him yet," observed Bagshaw, "or even been into
the house."
"It's a long time to stand on the door-step," observed Buller.
"Yes," said Father Brown; "it's rather a long time to stand in the
street."
"I've been home since then," said the cigar merchant. "Been writing
letters and came out again to post them."
"You'll have to tell all that later," said Bagshaw. "Good night--or
good morning."
The trial of Osric Orm for the murder of Sir Humphrey Gwynne, which
filled the newspapers for so many weeks, really turned entirely on the
same crux as that little talk under the lamp-post, when the grey-green
dawn was breaking about the dark streets and gardens. Everything came
back to the enigma of those two empty hours between the time when Buller
saw Orm going in at the garden gate, and the time when Father Brown
found him apparently still lingering in the garden. He had certainly had
the time to commit six murders, and might almost have committed them for
want of something to do; for he could give no coherent account of what
he was doing. It was argued by the prosecution that he had also the
opportunity, as the front door was unlatched, and the side-door into the
larger garden left standing open. The court followed, with considerable
interest, Bagshaw's clear reconstruction of the struggle in the passage,
of which the traces were so evident; indeed, the police had since found
the shot that had shattered the glass. Finally, the hole in the hedge to
which he had been tracked, had very much the appearance of a
hiding-place. On the other hand. Sir Matthew Blake, the very able
counsel for the defence, turned this last argument the other way: asking
why any man should entrap himself in a place without possible exit, when
it would obviously be much more sensible to slip out into the street.
Sir Matthew Blake also made effective use of the mystery that still
rested upon the motive for the murder. Indeed, upon this point, the
passages between Sir Matthew Blake and Sir Arthur Travers, the equally
brilliant advocate for the prosecution, turned rather to the advantage
of the prisoner. Sir Arthur could only throw out suggestions about a
Bolshevist conspiracy which sounded a little thin. But when it came to
investigating the facts of Orm's mysterious behaviour that night he was
considerably more effective.
The prisoner went into the witness-box, chiefly because his astute
counsel calculated that it would create a bad impression if he did not.
But he was almost as uncommunicative to his own counsel as to the
prosecuting counsel. Sir Arthur Travers made all possible capital out of
his stubborn silence, but did not succeed in breaking it. Sir Arthur was
a long, gaunt man, with a long, cadaverous face, in striking contrast to
the sturdy figure and bright, bird-like eye of Sir Matthew Blake. But if
Sir Matthew suggested a very cocksure sort of cock-sparrow, Sir Arthur
might more truly have been compared to a crane or stork; as he leaned
forward, prodding the poet with questions, his long nose might have been
a long beak.
"Do you mean to tell the jury," he asked, in tones of grating
incredulity, "that you never went in to see the deceased gentleman at
all?"
"No!" replied Orm shortly.
"You wanted to see him, I suppose. You must have been very anxious to
see him. Didn't you wait two whole hours in front of his front door?"
"Yes," replied the other.
"And yet you never even noticed the door was open?"
"No," said Orm.
"What in the world were you doing for two hours in somebody's else's
front garden?" insisted the barrister; "You were doing something, I
suppose?"
"Yes."
"Is it a secret?" asked Sir Arthur, with adamantine jocularity.
"It's a secret from you," answered the poet.
It was upon this suggestion of a secret that Sir Arthur seized in
developing his line of accusation. With a boldness which some thought
unscrupulous, he turned the very mystery of the motive, which was the
strongest part of his opponent's case, into an argument for his own. He
gave it as the first fragmentary hint of some far-flung and elaborate
conspiracy, in which a patriot had perished like one caught in the coils
of an octopus.
"Yes," he cried in a vibrating voice, "my learned friend is perfectly
right! We do not know the exact reason why this honourable public
servant was murdered. We shall not know the reason why the next public
servant is murdered. If my learned friend himself falls a victim to his
eminence, and the hatred which the hellish powers of destruction feel
for the guardians of law, he will be murdered, and he will not know the
reason. Half the decent people in this court will be butchered in their
beds, and we shall not know the reason. And we shall never know the
reason and never arrest the massacre, until it has depopulated our
country, so long as the defence is permitted to stop all proceedings
with this stale tag about 'motive,' when every other fact in the case,
every glaring incongruity, every gaping silence, tells us that we stand
in the presence of Cain."
"I never knew Sir Arthur so excited," said Bagshaw to his group of
companions afterwards. "Some people are saying he went beyond the usual
limit and that the prosecutor in a murder case oughtn't to be so
vindictive. But I must say there was something downright creepy about
that little goblin with the yellow hair, that seemed to play up to the
impression. I was vaguely recalling, all the time, something that De
Quincey says about Mr. Williams, that ghastly criminal who slaughtered
two whole families almost in silence. I think he says that Williams had
hair of a vivid unnatural yellow; and that he thought it had been dyed
by a trick learned in India, where they dye horses green or blue. Then
there was his queer, stony silence, like a troglodyte's; I'll never deny
that it all worked me up until I felt there was a sort of monster in the
dock. If that was only Sir Arthur's eloquence, then he certainly took a
heavy responsibility in putting so much passion into it."
"He was a friend of poor Gwynne's, as a matter of fact," said Underhill,
more gently; "a man I know saw them hobnobbing together after a great
legal dinner lately. I dare say that's why he feels so strongly in this
case. I suppose it's doubtful whether a man ought to act in such a case
on mere personal feeling."
"He wouldn't," said Bagshaw. "I bet Sir Arthur Travers wouldn't act only
on feeling, however strongly he felt. He's got a very stiff sense of his
own professional position. He's one of those men who are ambitious even
when they've satisfied their ambition. I know nobody who'd take more
trouble to keep his position in the world. No; you've got hold of the
wrong moral to his rather thundering sermon. If he lets himself go like
that, it's because he thinks he can get a conviction, anyhow, and wants
to put himself at the head of some political movement against the
conspiracy he talks about. He must have some very good reason for
wanting to convict Orm and some very good reason for thinking he can do
it. That means that the facts will support him. His confidence doesn't
look well for the prisoner." He became conscious of an insignificant
figure in the group.
"Well, Father Brown," he said with a smile; "what do you think of our
judicial procedure?"