Three men in a boat (to say nothing of the dog)
have been over it a fairish number of times, but I have never been able
to get the hang of it. The man who could row a straight course from
Oxford to Iffley ought to be able to live comfortably, under one roof,
with his wife, his mother-in-law, his elder sister, and the old servant
who was in the family when he was a baby.
First the current drives you on to the right bank, and then on to the
left, then it takes you out into the middle, turns you round three
times, and carries you up stream again, and always ends by trying to
smash you up against a college barge.
Of course, as a consequence of this, we got in the way of a good many
other boats, during the mile, and they in ours, and, of course, as a
consequence of that, a good deal of bad language occurred.
I don’t know why it should be, but everybody is always so exceptionally
irritable on the river. Little mishaps, that you would hardly notice on
dry land, drive you nearly frantic with rage, when they occur on the
water. When Harris or George makes an ass of himself on dry land, I
smile indulgently; when they behave in a chuckle-head way on the river,
I use the most blood-curdling language to them. When another boat gets
in my way, I feel I want to take an oar and kill all the people in it.
The mildest tempered people, when on land, become violent and
blood-thirsty when in a boat. I did a little boating once with a young
lady. She was naturally of the sweetest and gentlest disposition
imaginable, but on the river it was quite awful to hear her.
“Oh, drat the man!” she would exclaim, when some unfortunate sculler
would get in her way; “why don’t he look where he’s going?”
And, “Oh, bother the silly old thing!” she would say indignantly, when
the sail would not go up properly. And she would catch hold of it, and
shake it quite brutally.
Yet, as I have said, when on shore she was kind-hearted and amiable
enough.
[Picture: Man at the lock] [Picture: Man at the lock] The air of the
river has a demoralising effect upon one’s temper, and this it is,
I suppose, which causes even barge men to be sometimes rude to one
another, and to use language which, no doubt, in their calmer moments
they regret.
CHAPTER XIX.
Oxford.—Montmorency’s idea of Heaven.—The hired up-river boat,
its beauties and advantages.—The “Pride of the Thames.”—The
weather changes.—The river under different aspects.—Not a cheerful
evening.—Yearnings for the unattainable.—The cheery chat goes
round.—George performs upon the banjo.—A mournful melody.—Another wet
day.—Flight.—A little supper and a toast.
[Picture: Dog running] We spent two very pleasant days at Oxford. There
are plenty of dogs in the town of Oxford. Montmorency had eleven fights
on the first day, and fourteen on the second, and evidently thought he
had got to heaven.
[Picture: Dogs fighting] Among folk too constitutionally weak, or too
constitutionally lazy, whichever it may be, to relish up-stream work,
it is a common practice to get a boat at Oxford, and row down. For the
energetic, however, the up-stream journey is certainly to be preferred.
It does not seem good to be always going with the current. There is
more satisfaction in squaring one’s back, and fighting against it, and
winning one’s way forward in spite of it—at least, so I feel, when
Harris and George are sculling and I am steering.
[Picture: Dog running] To those who do contemplate making Oxford their
starting-place, I would say, take your own boat—unless, of course, you
can take someone else’s without any possible danger of being found
out. The boats that, as a rule, are let for hire on the Thames above
Marlow, are very good boats. They are fairly water-tight; and so long
as they are handled with care, they rarely come to pieces, or sink.
There are places in them to sit down on, and they are complete with all
the necessary arrangements—or nearly all—to enable you to row them and
steer them.
But they are not ornamental. The boat you hire up the river above
Marlow is not the sort of boat in which you can flash about and give
yourself airs. The hired up-river boat very soon puts a stop to any
nonsense of that sort on the part of its occupants. That is its
chief—one may say, its only recommendation.
[Picture: Dog] The man in the hired up-river boat is modest and
retiring. He likes to keep on the shady side, underneath the trees, and
to do most of his travelling early in the morning or late at night,
when there are not many people about on the river to look at him.
When the man in the hired up-river boat sees anyone he knows, he gets
out on to the bank, and hides behind a tree.
I was one of a party who hired an up-river boat one summer, for a few
days’ trip. We had none of us ever seen the hired up-river boat before;
and we did not know what it was when we did see it.
We had written for a boat—a double sculling skiff; and when we went
down with our bags to the yard, and gave our names, the man said:
[Picture: The Pride of the Thames] “Oh, yes; you’re the party that
wrote for a double sculling skiff. It’s all right. Jim, fetch round
_The Pride of the Thames_.”
The boy went, and re-appeared five minutes afterwards, struggling
with an antediluvian chunk of wood, that looked as though it had been
recently dug out of somewhere, and dug out carelessly, so as to have
been unnecessarily damaged in the process.
My own idea, on first catching sight of the object, was that it was a
Roman relic of some sort,—relic of _what_ I do not know, possibly of a
coffin.
The neighbourhood of the upper Thames is rich in Roman relics, and my
surmise seemed to me a very probable one; but our serious young man,
who is a bit of a geologist, pooh-poohed my Roman relic theory, and
said it was clear to the meanest intellect (in which category he seemed
to be grieved that he could not conscientiously include mine) that
the thing the boy had found was the fossil of a whale; and he pointed
out to us various evidences proving that it must have belonged to the
preglacial period.
To settle the dispute, we appealed to the boy. We told him not to
be afraid, but to speak the plain truth: Was it the fossil of a
pre-Adamite whale, or was it an early Roman coffin?
The boy said it was _The Pride of the Thames_.
We thought this a very humorous answer on the part of the boy at first,
and somebody gave him twopence as a reward for his ready wit; but when
he persisted in keeping up the joke, as we thought, too long, we got
vexed with him.
“Come, come, my lad!” said our captain sharply, “don’t let us have any
nonsense. You take your mother’s washing-tub home again, and bring us a
boat.”
The boat-builder himself came up then, and assured us, on his word, as
a practical man, that the thing really was a boat—was, in fact, _the_
boat, the “double sculling skiff” selected to take us on our trip down
the river.
We grumbled a good deal. We thought he might, at least, have had it
whitewashed or tarred—had _something_ done to it to distinguish it from
a bit of a wreck; but he could not see any fault in it.
He even seemed offended at our remarks. He said he had picked us out
the best boat in all his stock, and he thought we might have been more
grateful.
He said it, _The Pride of the Thames_, had been in use, just as it now
stood (or rather as it now hung together), for the last forty years, to
_his_ knowledge, and nobody had complained of it before, and he did not
see why we should be the first to begin.
We argued no more.
We fastened the so-called boat together with some pieces of string,
got a bit of wall-paper and pasted over the shabbier places, said our
prayers, and stepped on board.
They charged us thirty-five shillings for the loan of the remnant
for six days; and we could have bought the thing out-and-out for
four-and-sixpence at any sale of drift-wood round the coast.
The weather changed on the third day,—Oh! I am talking about our
present trip now,—and we started from Oxford upon our homeward journey
in the midst of a steady drizzle.
The river—with the sunlight flashing from its dancing wavelets, gilding
gold the grey-green beech-trunks, glinting through the dark, cool wood
paths, chasing shadows o’er the shallows, flinging diamonds from the
mill-wheels, throwing kisses to the lilies, wantoning with the weirs’
white waters, silvering moss-grown walls and bridges, brightening every
tiny townlet, making sweet each lane and meadow, lying tangled in the
rushes, peeping, laughing, from each inlet, gleaming gay on many a far
sail, making soft the air with glory—is a golden fairy stream.
But the river—chill and weary, with the ceaseless rain-drops falling on
its brown and sluggish waters, with a sound as of a woman, weeping low
in some dark chamber; while the woods, all dark and silent, shrouded in
their mists of vapour, stand like ghosts upon the margin; silent ghosts
with eyes reproachful, like the ghosts of evil actions, like the ghosts
of friends neglected—is a spirit-haunted water through the land of vain
regrets.
Sunlight is the life-blood of Nature. Mother Earth looks at us with
such dull, soulless eyes, when the sunlight has died away from out of
her. It makes us sad to be with her then; she does not seem to know
us or to care for us. She is as a widow who has lost the husband she
loved, and her children touch her hand, and look up into her eyes, but
gain no smile from her.
We rowed on all that day through the rain, and very melancholy work
it was. We pretended, at first, that we enjoyed it. We said it was a
change, and that we liked to see the river under all its different
aspects. We said we could not expect to have it all sunshine, nor
should we wish it. We told each other that Nature was beautiful, even
in her tears.
[Picture: The boat in the rain]
Indeed, Harris and I were quite enthusiastic about the business, for
the first few hours. And we sang a song about a gipsy’s life, and how
delightful a gipsy’s existence was!—free to storm and sunshine, and to
every wind that blew!—and how he enjoyed the rain, and what a lot of
good it did him; and how he laughed at people who didn’t like it.
George took the fun more soberly, and stuck to the umbrella.
We hoisted the cover before we had lunch, and kept it up all the
afternoon, just leaving a little space in the bow, from which one of us
could paddle and keep a look-out. In this way we made nine miles, and
pulled up for the night a little below Day’s Lock.
I cannot honestly say that we had a merry evening. The rain poured
down with quiet persistency. Everything in the boat was damp and
clammy. Supper was not a success. Cold veal pie, when you don’t feel
hungry, is apt to cloy. I felt I wanted whitebait and a cutlet; Harris
babbled of soles and white-sauce, and passed the remains of his pie to
Montmorency, who declined it, and, apparently insulted by the offer,
went and sat over at the other end of the boat by himself.
George requested that we would not talk about these things, at all
events until he had finished his cold boiled beef without mustard.
We played penny nap after supper. We played for about an hour and a
half, by the end of which time George had won fourpence—George always
is lucky at cards—and Harris and I had lost exactly twopence each.
We thought we would give up gambling then. As Harris said, it breeds an
unhealthy excitement when carried too far. George offered to go on and
give us our revenge; but Harris and I decided not to battle any further
against Fate.
After that, we mixed ourselves some toddy, and sat round and talked.
George told us about a man he had known, who had come up the river
two years ago and who had slept out in a damp boat on just such